Holding · OSE

Orkla ASA ORK

Full classification reasoning chain. Explainable AI: every weight, source, and DNSH assessment is auditable and exportable.

Art.6Verified

Classification reasoning

Aligned with ARTICLE 6 criteria on the basis of substantial contribution to climate mitigation, DNSH compliance across all six environmental objectives, and adherence to minimum safeguards (UNGC, OECD MNE, IFC PS).

Annual sustainability report (2024)

Documented absolute GHG reduction trajectory consistent with 1.5°C pathway.

42%

Taxonomy KPI report (2024)

Green revenue share disclosed at 62%; CapEx alignment 71%; OpEx alignment 58%.

28%

Independent verifier (DNV)

CSRD limited assurance provided.

18%

Sector benchmark (Bloomberg ESG)

Top-quartile decile in sector for climate disclosure.

12%

Confidence + completeness

Classification confidence86.0%

Data completeness92.0%

Source diversity74.0%

Sources

4 distinct sources · 1 independent verifier · last refresh 4d ago

Taxonomy alignment per objective

climate Mitigation

62.0%

climate Adaptation

18.0%

water

21.0%

circular Economy

31.0%

pollution

14.0%

biodiversity

8.0%

Eligible: 78% · Aligned: 62% · CapEx: 71% · OpEx: 58%

DNSH assessment

✓
Climate Mitigation
GHG trajectory ≤ 1.5°C pathway · validated.
✓
Climate Adaptation
Physical risk plan documented, board-approved.
✓
Water
No high-water-stress region exposure documented.
✓
Circular Economy
Recycling KPIs reported.
✓
Pollution
No serious pollution incidents reported.
✓
Biodiversity
No critical habitat conflicts.

Physical climate exposure

Physical risk score

0.41

Transition risk

0.38

Heat stress

0.34

Water stress

0.46

Flood exposure

0.22

Insurance Δ 3y

+11.4%

Carbon intensity

248 tCO₂e/€M

Climate FV delta

-3.4%

Minimum safeguards

· UN Global Compact: signatory · no monitored violations
· OECD MNE Guidelines: aligned
· IFC Performance Standards: documented
· UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: aligned