COMPLY/Arbitrage Detector
COMPLY · Unique capability
Regulatory arbitrage detector
Cross-jurisdiction intelligence. Same regulation, different competitive implications. Maps EU, EEA, UK, Swiss, US requirements and flags relative advantages.
SFDR Q3 amendment — domicile arbitrage
The 85% taxonomy threshold for Article 9 disproportionately impacts Luxembourg/Irish-domiciled funds. NO/SE-domiciled UCITS structures retain Article 9 with lower compliance uplift.
Advantaged
- + Norwegian UCITS
- + Swedish UCITS
Disadvantaged
- − Luxembourg SICAV
- − Irish ICAV
Jurisdiction cost map
| Jurisdiction | Level | Cost est. |
|---|---|---|
| NO | LOW | €80k |
| SE | MEDIUM | €220k |
| LU | HIGH | €480k |
| IE | HIGH | €410k |
CSRD sector-specific ESRS Set-2 — energy sector
EFRAG sector-specific drafts for oil & gas elevate the bar for energy sector funds. UK-domiciled funds under FCA SDR face lighter burden than EU peers; Norwegian funds gain time-to-comply advantage.
Advantaged
- + UK FCA SDR funds
- + Norwegian funds (delayed transposition)
Disadvantaged
- − Luxembourg energy thematic funds
- − Irish energy thematic
Jurisdiction cost map
| Jurisdiction | Level | Cost est. |
|---|---|---|
| UK | LOW | €60k |
| NO | MEDIUM | €180k |
| LU | HIGH | €420k |